Oman vs Zimbabwe: General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per

Oman
24,860 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
20,902 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Oman rank
179th
Zimbabwe rank
181st

General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per over time

  • Oman
  • Zimbabwe
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119922023

How they compare

Oman currently reports 24,860 current LCU per square kilometre against 20,902 current LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 3,958 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Oman's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 57 years both countries report, Oman has been ahead every year.

Oman ranks 179th and Zimbabwe ranks 181st of 184 countries.

Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oman Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 11.42 current LCU per square kilometre 0.1865 current LCU per square kilometre 11.23 current LCU per square kilometre Oman
1970s 551.53 current LCU per square kilometre 0.525 current LCU per square kilometre 551.01 current LCU per square kilometre Oman
1980s 2,605 current LCU per square kilometre 1.49 current LCU per square kilometre 2,604 current LCU per square kilometre Oman
1990s 4,455 current LCU per square kilometre 1.37 current LCU per square kilometre 4,454 current LCU per square kilometre Oman
2000s 7,842 current LCU per square kilometre 0.8869 current LCU per square kilometre 7,841 current LCU per square kilometre Oman
2010s 21,598 current LCU per square kilometre 5.48 current LCU per square kilometre 21,592 current LCU per square kilometre Oman
2020s 24,388 current LCU per square kilometre 5,915 current LCU per square kilometre 18,473 current LCU per square kilometre Oman

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per, Oman or Zimbabwe?
Oman, at 24,860 current LCU per square kilometre against 20,902 current LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per between Oman and Zimbabwe?
3,958 current LCU per square kilometre, with Oman ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Zimbabwe?
57 years are reported by both, from 1967 to 2023.
How do Oman and Zimbabwe rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per?
Oman ranks 179th and Zimbabwe ranks 181st of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oman vs Zimbabwe: General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/oman/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/oman/zimbabwe/">Oman vs Zimbabwe: General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 8,172 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.