Lebanon vs Macao: General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per

Lebanon
8.71 billion current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Macao
1.55 billion current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Lebanon rank
2nd
Macao rank
5th

General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per over time

  • Lebanon
  • Macao
02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B198220022023

How they compare

Lebanon currently reports 8.71 billion current LCU per square kilometre against 1.55 billion current LCU per square kilometre in Macao, a difference of 7.16 billion current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Lebanon's figure about 5.6 times Macao's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1989 it was Macao ahead.

Lebanon ranks 2nd and Macao ranks 5th of 184 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Lebanon averaged higher in 2 and Macao in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lebanon Macao Difference Ahead
1980s 23.85 million current LCU per square kilometre 101.95 million current LCU per square kilometre 78.10 million current LCU per square kilometre Macao
1990s 239.02 million current LCU per square kilometre 253.35 million current LCU per square kilometre 14.33 million current LCU per square kilometre Macao
2000s 500.49 million current LCU per square kilometre 366.15 million current LCU per square kilometre 134.34 million current LCU per square kilometre Lebanon
2010s 951.37 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.03 billion current LCU per square kilometre 81.71 million current LCU per square kilometre Macao
2020s 3.10 billion current LCU per square kilometre 1.60 billion current LCU per square kilometre 1.50 billion current LCU per square kilometre Lebanon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per, Lebanon or Macao?
Lebanon, at 8.71 billion current LCU per square kilometre against 1.55 billion current LCU per square kilometre in Macao as of 2023.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per between Lebanon and Macao?
7.16 billion current LCU per square kilometre, with Lebanon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Macao?
35 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 2023.
How do Lebanon and Macao rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per?
Lebanon ranks 2nd and Macao ranks 5th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lebanon vs Macao: General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/lebanon/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/lebanon/macao-sar-china/">Lebanon vs Macao: General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 8,172 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.