South Korea vs Macao: General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per

South Korea
4.39 billion current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Macao
1.55 billion current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
South Korea rank
3rd
Macao rank
5th

General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per over time

  • South Korea
  • Macao
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B196119922023

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 4.39 billion current LCU per square kilometre against 1.55 billion current LCU per square kilometre in Macao, a difference of 2.84 billion current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes South Korea's figure about 2.8 times Macao's.

Across all 42 years both countries report, South Korea has been ahead every year.

South Korea ranks 3rd and Macao ranks 5th of 184 countries.

South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Korea Macao Difference Ahead
1980s 112.03 million current LCU per square kilometre 49.76 million current LCU per square kilometre 62.27 million current LCU per square kilometre South Korea
1990s 445.56 million current LCU per square kilometre 253.35 million current LCU per square kilometre 192.20 million current LCU per square kilometre South Korea
2000s 1.24 billion current LCU per square kilometre 366.15 million current LCU per square kilometre 870.93 million current LCU per square kilometre South Korea
2010s 2.55 billion current LCU per square kilometre 1.03 billion current LCU per square kilometre 1.52 billion current LCU per square kilometre South Korea
2020s 4.01 billion current LCU per square kilometre 1.60 billion current LCU per square kilometre 2.41 billion current LCU per square kilometre South Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per, South Korea or Macao?
South Korea, at 4.39 billion current LCU per square kilometre against 1.55 billion current LCU per square kilometre in Macao as of 2023.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per between South Korea and Macao?
2.84 billion current LCU per square kilometre, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Macao?
42 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do South Korea and Macao rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per?
South Korea ranks 3rd and Macao ranks 5th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Korea vs Macao: General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/korea-rep/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/korea-rep/macao-sar-china/">South Korea vs Macao: General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 8,172 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.