Iceland vs Pakistan: General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per

Iceland
10.93 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
11.22 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
52nd
Pakistan rank
51st

General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per over time

  • Iceland
  • Pakistan
02.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 11.22 million current LCU per square kilometre against 10.93 million current LCU per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 299,100 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Pakistan ahead.

Iceland ranks 52nd and Pakistan ranks 51st of 184 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 5 and Pakistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Pakistan Difference Ahead
1970s 5,975 current LCU per square kilometre 14,959 current LCU per square kilometre 8,985 current LCU per square kilometre Pakistan
1980s 289,246 current LCU per square kilometre 79,377 current LCU per square kilometre 209,869 current LCU per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 1.13 million current LCU per square kilometre 282,347 current LCU per square kilometre 848,557 current LCU per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 2.79 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.18 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.62 million current LCU per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 5.60 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.99 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.62 million current LCU per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 9.58 million current LCU per square kilometre 8.87 million current LCU per square kilometre 706,208 current LCU per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per, Iceland or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 11.22 million current LCU per square kilometre against 10.93 million current LCU per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per between Iceland and Pakistan?
299,100 current LCU per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Pakistan?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Pakistan rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per?
Iceland ranks 52nd and Pakistan ranks 51st of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Pakistan: General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/iceland/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/iceland/pakistan/">Iceland vs Pakistan: General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 8,172 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.