Hong Kong vs Uzbekistan: General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per

Hong Kong
377.92 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Uzbekistan
437.50 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong rank
8th
Uzbekistan rank
7th

General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Uzbekistan
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M196119922023

How they compare

Uzbekistan currently reports 437.50 million current LCU per square kilometre against 377.92 million current LCU per square kilometre in Hong Kong, a difference of 59.58 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.2 times Hong Kong's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Hong Kong ahead.

Hong Kong ranks 8th and Uzbekistan ranks 7th of 184 countries.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 91.14 million current LCU per square kilometre 358,484 current LCU per square kilometre 90.78 million current LCU per square kilometre Hong Kong
2000s 130.90 million current LCU per square kilometre 7.01 million current LCU per square kilometre 123.89 million current LCU per square kilometre Hong Kong
2010s 214.81 million current LCU per square kilometre 77.86 million current LCU per square kilometre 136.95 million current LCU per square kilometre Hong Kong
2020s 358.14 million current LCU per square kilometre 335.12 million current LCU per square kilometre 23.02 million current LCU per square kilometre Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per, Hong Kong or Uzbekistan?
Uzbekistan, at 437.50 million current LCU per square kilometre against 377.92 million current LCU per square kilometre in Hong Kong as of 2023.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per between Hong Kong and Uzbekistan?
59.58 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Uzbekistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Uzbekistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong and Uzbekistan rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per?
Hong Kong ranks 8th and Uzbekistan ranks 7th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Uzbekistan: General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/uzbekistan/">Hong Kong vs Uzbekistan: General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 8,172 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.