Curacao vs Gambia: General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per
Curacao
1.78 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2018
Gambia
1.39 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Curacao rank
99th
Gambia rank
102nd
General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per over time
- Curacao
- Gambia
How they compare
Curacao currently reports 1.78 million current LCU per square kilometre against 1.39 million current LCU per square kilometre in Gambia, a difference of 392,060 current LCU per square kilometre.
That makes Curacao's figure about 1.3 times Gambia's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Curacao has been ahead every year.
Curacao ranks 99th and Gambia ranks 102nd of 184 countries.
Curacao has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per, Curacao or Gambia?
- Curacao, at 1.78 million current LCU per square kilometre against 1.39 million current LCU per square kilometre in Gambia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per between Curacao and Gambia?
- 392,060 current LCU per square kilometre, with Curacao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Gambia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2018.
- How do Curacao and Gambia rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per?
- Curacao ranks 99th and Gambia ranks 102nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.