Congo vs Norway: General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per

Congo
3.56 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
3.09 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
79th
Norway rank
82nd

General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per over time

  • Congo
  • Norway
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 3.56 million current LCU per square kilometre against 3.09 million current LCU per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 479,090 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.2 times Norway's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Norway ahead.

Congo ranks 79th and Norway ranks 82nd of 184 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 5 and Norway in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Norway Difference Ahead
1970s 84,275 current LCU per square kilometre 84,555 current LCU per square kilometre 279.66 current LCU per square kilometre Norway
1980s 365,095 current LCU per square kilometre 272,113 current LCU per square kilometre 92,982 current LCU per square kilometre Congo
1990s 617,692 current LCU per square kilometre 560,810 current LCU per square kilometre 56,882 current LCU per square kilometre Congo
2000s 1.34 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.08 million current LCU per square kilometre 261,215 current LCU per square kilometre Congo
2010s 3.47 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.95 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.52 million current LCU per square kilometre Congo
2020s 3.49 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.79 million current LCU per square kilometre 698,505 current LCU per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per, Congo or Norway?
Congo, at 3.56 million current LCU per square kilometre against 3.09 million current LCU per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per between Congo and Norway?
479,090 current LCU per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Norway?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Congo and Norway rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per?
Congo ranks 79th and Norway ranks 82nd of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Norway: General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/norway/">Congo vs Norway: General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 8,172 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.