Democratic Republic of Congo vs New Caledonia: General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per

Democratic Republic of Congo
12.72 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia
12.47 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2017
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
47th
New Caledonia rank
48th

General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • New Caledonia
05.0M10.0M15.0M198120022023

How they compare

Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 12.72 million current LCU per square kilometre against 12.47 million current LCU per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 250,300 current LCU per square kilometre.

Across all 20 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 47th and New Caledonia ranks 48th of 184 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1990s 854.24 current LCU per square kilometre 6.13 million current LCU per square kilometre 6.13 million current LCU per square kilometre New Caledonia
2000s 265,107 current LCU per square kilometre 8.40 million current LCU per square kilometre 8.14 million current LCU per square kilometre New Caledonia
2010s 2.19 million current LCU per square kilometre 11.94 million current LCU per square kilometre 9.74 million current LCU per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per, Democratic Republic of Congo or New Caledonia?
Democratic Republic of Congo, at 12.72 million current LCU per square kilometre against 12.47 million current LCU per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per between Democratic Republic of Congo and New Caledonia?
250,300 current LCU per square kilometre, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and New Caledonia?
20 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2017.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and New Caledonia rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 47th and New Caledonia ranks 48th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs New Caledonia: General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/new-caledonia/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs New Caledonia: General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 8,172 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.