Chile vs French Polynesia: General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per

Chile
58.13 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
French Polynesia
62.00 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
25th
French Polynesia rank
22nd

General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per over time

  • Chile
  • French Polynesia
020.0M40.0M60.0M196119922023

How they compare

French Polynesia currently reports 62.00 million current LCU per square kilometre against 58.13 million current LCU per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 3.87 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes French Polynesia's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, French Polynesia has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 25th and French Polynesia ranks 22nd of 184 countries.

French Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile French Polynesia Difference Ahead
1990s 4.07 million current LCU per square kilometre 20.25 million current LCU per square kilometre 16.18 million current LCU per square kilometre French Polynesia
2000s 12.03 million current LCU per square kilometre 48.13 million current LCU per square kilometre 36.10 million current LCU per square kilometre French Polynesia
2010s 28.55 million current LCU per square kilometre 52.70 million current LCU per square kilometre 24.15 million current LCU per square kilometre French Polynesia
2020s 50.30 million current LCU per square kilometre 59.89 million current LCU per square kilometre 9.59 million current LCU per square kilometre French Polynesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per, Chile or French Polynesia?
French Polynesia, at 62.00 million current LCU per square kilometre against 58.13 million current LCU per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per between Chile and French Polynesia?
3.87 million current LCU per square kilometre, with French Polynesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and French Polynesia?
29 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Chile and French Polynesia rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per?
Chile ranks 25th and French Polynesia ranks 22nd of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs French Polynesia: General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chile/french-polynesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chile/french-polynesia/">Chile vs French Polynesia: General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 8,172 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.