Cambodia vs Chile: General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per

Cambodia
59.92 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile
58.13 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Cambodia rank
23rd
Chile rank
25th

General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per over time

  • Cambodia
  • Chile
020.0M40.0M60.0M196119922023

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 59.92 million current LCU per square kilometre against 58.13 million current LCU per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 1.79 million current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cambodia ahead.

Cambodia ranks 23rd and Chile ranks 25th of 184 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 4 and Chile in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Chile Difference Ahead
1960s 30,340 current LCU per square kilometre 3.89 current LCU per square kilometre 30,336 current LCU per square kilometre Cambodia
1970s 50,986 current LCU per square kilometre 17.74 current LCU per square kilometre 50,968 current LCU per square kilometre Cambodia
1990s 2.91 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.68 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.77 million current LCU per square kilometre Chile
2000s 9.51 million current LCU per square kilometre 10.62 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.11 million current LCU per square kilometre Chile
2010s 29.94 million current LCU per square kilometre 28.55 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.39 million current LCU per square kilometre Cambodia
2020s 53.65 million current LCU per square kilometre 50.30 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.35 million current LCU per square kilometre Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per, Cambodia or Chile?
Cambodia, at 59.92 million current LCU per square kilometre against 58.13 million current LCU per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per between Cambodia and Chile?
1.79 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Chile?
41 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cambodia and Chile rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per?
Cambodia ranks 23rd and Chile ranks 25th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs Chile: General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cambodia/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cambodia/chile/">Cambodia vs Chile: General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 8,172 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.