Cape Verde vs Democratic Republic of Congo: General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per

Cape Verde
14.27 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Democratic Republic of Congo
12.72 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Cape Verde rank
45th
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
47th

General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Democratic Republic of Congo
05.0M10.0M15.0M199420082023

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 14.27 million current LCU per square kilometre against 12.72 million current LCU per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 1.55 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.1 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Cape Verde has been ahead every year.

Cape Verde ranks 45th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 47th of 184 countries.

Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Democratic Republic of Congo Difference Ahead
2000s 6.70 million current LCU per square kilometre 599,794 current LCU per square kilometre 6.10 million current LCU per square kilometre Cape Verde
2010s 8.58 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.89 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.69 million current LCU per square kilometre Cape Verde
2020s 12.81 million current LCU per square kilometre 9.45 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.36 million current LCU per square kilometre Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per, Cape Verde or Democratic Republic of Congo?
Cape Verde, at 14.27 million current LCU per square kilometre against 12.72 million current LCU per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per between Cape Verde and Democratic Republic of Congo?
1.55 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Democratic Republic of Congo?
17 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
How do Cape Verde and Democratic Republic of Congo rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per?
Cape Verde ranks 45th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 47th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Democratic Republic of Congo: General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/congo-dem-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/congo-dem-rep/">Cape Verde vs Democratic Republic of Congo: General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 8,172 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.