How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Rwanda?

66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo vs Rwanda: General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per

Congo

217,726 current LCU per person

in 2025

Rwanda

241,699 current LCU per person

in 2025

Congo rank

38th

Rwanda rank

36th

General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per over time

Congo
Rwanda

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 241,699 current LCU per person against 217,726 current LCU per person in Congo, a difference of 23,973 current LCU per person.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 38th and Rwanda ranks 36th of 187 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo	Rwanda	Difference	Ahead
1960s	6,300 current LCU per person	315 current LCU per person	5,985 current LCU per person	Congo
1970s	17,532 current LCU per person	1,491 current LCU per person	16,041 current LCU per person	Congo
1980s	60,222 current LCU per person	3,269 current LCU per person	56,953 current LCU per person	Congo
1990s	77,786 current LCU per person	6,352 current LCU per person	71,433 current LCU per person	Congo
2000s	122,592 current LCU per person	27,343 current LCU per person	95,250 current LCU per person	Congo
2010s	234,641 current LCU per person	73,388 current LCU per person	161,253 current LCU per person	Congo
2020s	202,928 current LCU per person	186,416 current LCU per person	16,512 current LCU per person	Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per, Congo or Rwanda?: Rwanda, at 241,699 current LCU per person against 217,726 current LCU per person in Congo as of 2025.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per between Congo and Rwanda?: 23,973 current LCU per person, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Rwanda?: 66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Congo and Rwanda rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per?: Congo ranks 38th and Rwanda ranks 36th of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Rwanda: General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-capita/congo-rep/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-capita/congo-rep/rwanda/">Congo vs Rwanda: General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per capita
Unit: current LCU per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 187 places, 8,753 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 10 September 2026

General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.