Pakistan vs Rwanda: General government final consumption expenditure

Pakistan
3.96 trillion constant LCU
in 2025
Rwanda
3.28 trillion constant LCU
in 2025
Pakistan rank
23rd
Rwanda rank
26th

General government final consumption expenditure over time

  • Pakistan
  • Rwanda
01.0T2.0T3.0T4.0T196019922025

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 3.96 trillion constant LCU against 3.28 trillion constant LCU in Rwanda, a difference of 682.53 billion constant LCU.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.2 times Rwanda's.

Across all 66 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.

Pakistan ranks 23rd and Rwanda ranks 26th of 175 countries.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 271.54 billion constant LCU 59.97 billion constant LCU 211.57 billion constant LCU Pakistan
1970s 470.78 billion constant LCU 150.84 billion constant LCU 319.94 billion constant LCU Pakistan
1980s 946.37 billion constant LCU 267.96 billion constant LCU 678.41 billion constant LCU Pakistan
1990s 1.46 trillion constant LCU 361.23 billion constant LCU 1.10 trillion constant LCU Pakistan
2000s 2.06 trillion constant LCU 696.16 billion constant LCU 1.36 trillion constant LCU Pakistan
2010s 3.21 trillion constant LCU 1.55 trillion constant LCU 1.66 trillion constant LCU Pakistan
2020s 3.98 trillion constant LCU 2.91 trillion constant LCU 1.07 trillion constant LCU Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure, Pakistan or Rwanda?
Pakistan, at 3.96 trillion constant LCU against 3.28 trillion constant LCU in Rwanda as of 2025.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure between Pakistan and Rwanda?
682.53 billion constant LCU, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Rwanda?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Pakistan and Rwanda rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure?
Pakistan ranks 23rd and Rwanda ranks 26th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Rwanda: General government final consumption expenditure. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu/pakistan/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu/pakistan/rwanda/">Pakistan vs Rwanda: General government final consumption expenditure</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
175 places, 7,363 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure is expenditure on goods and services by resident institutional units for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. General government FCE includes all government current expenditures for purchases of goods and services (including compensation of employees), and most expenditures on national defense and security, but excludes government military expenditures that are part of government capital formation. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.