Australia vs Chad: General government final consumption expenditure

Australia
622.17 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Chad
679.60 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Australia rank
60th
Chad rank
58th

General government final consumption expenditure over time

  • Australia
  • Chad
0250.0B500.0B750.0B1.0T1.2T196019922025

How they compare

Chad currently reports 679.60 billion constant LCU against 622.17 billion constant LCU in Australia, a difference of 57.44 billion constant LCU.

That makes Chad's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Chad ahead.

Australia ranks 60th and Chad ranks 58th of 175 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Chad in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Chad Difference Ahead
1980s 169.42 billion constant LCU 227.25 billion constant LCU 57.83 billion constant LCU Chad
1990s 212.20 billion constant LCU 137.38 billion constant LCU 74.82 billion constant LCU Australia
2000s 293.45 billion constant LCU 591.73 billion constant LCU 298.27 billion constant LCU Chad
2010s 392.71 billion constant LCU 728.75 billion constant LCU 336.03 billion constant LCU Chad
2020s 562.23 billion constant LCU 660.41 billion constant LCU 98.18 billion constant LCU Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure, Australia or Chad?
Chad, at 679.60 billion constant LCU against 622.17 billion constant LCU in Australia as of 2025.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure between Australia and Chad?
57.44 billion constant LCU, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Chad?
40 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2025.
How do Australia and Chad rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure?
Australia ranks 60th and Chad ranks 58th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Chad: General government final consumption expenditure. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu/australia/chad/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu/australia/chad/">Australia vs Chad: General government final consumption expenditure</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
175 places, 7,363 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure is expenditure on goods and services by resident institutional units for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. General government FCE includes all government current expenditures for purchases of goods and services (including compensation of employees), and most expenditures on national defense and security, but excludes government military expenditures that are part of government capital formation. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.