Burkina Faso vs Chile: General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per

Burkina Faso
82.16 constant LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Chile
100.52 constant LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Burkina Faso rank
22nd
Chile rank
21st

General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Chile
02505007501.0k1.2k196019922025

How they compare

Chile currently reports 100.52 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 82.16 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in Burkina Faso, a difference of 18.36 constant LCU per US$ of GDP.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times Burkina Faso's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Chile ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 22nd and Chile ranks 21st of 176 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Chile Difference Ahead
1960s 131.47 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 873.51 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 742.04 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Chile
1970s 148.32 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 710.17 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 561.85 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Chile
1980s 122.61 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 410.33 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 287.72 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Chile
1990s 127.71 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 205.77 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 78.07 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Chile
2000s 105.73 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 147.38 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 41.65 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Chile
2010s 84.7 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 92.64 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 7.94 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Chile
2020s 93.3 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 103.95 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 10.65 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per, Burkina Faso or Chile?
Chile, at 100.52 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 82.16 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in Burkina Faso as of 2025.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per between Burkina Faso and Chile?
18.36 constant LCU per US$ of GDP, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Chile?
61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
How do Burkina Faso and Chile rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per?
Burkina Faso ranks 22nd and Chile ranks 21st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Chile: General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/burkina-faso/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/burkina-faso/chile/">Burkina Faso vs Chile: General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant LCU per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 7,370 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.