Singapore vs Uganda: General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per

Singapore
79.74 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
71.09 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore rank
14th
Uganda rank
15th

General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per over time

  • Singapore
  • Uganda
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M196119922023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 79.74 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 71.09 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 8.64 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 1.1 times Uganda's.

Across all 42 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

Singapore ranks 14th and Uganda ranks 15th of 172 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Singapore Uganda Difference Ahead
1980s 11.37 million constant LCU per square kilometre 9.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.30 million constant LCU per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 20.18 million constant LCU per square kilometre 14.11 million constant LCU per square kilometre 6.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 38.37 million constant LCU per square kilometre 23.07 million constant LCU per square kilometre 15.30 million constant LCU per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 58.53 million constant LCU per square kilometre 40.13 million constant LCU per square kilometre 18.41 million constant LCU per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 79.29 million constant LCU per square kilometre 66.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre 12.83 million constant LCU per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per, Singapore or Uganda?
Singapore, at 79.74 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 71.09 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per between Singapore and Uganda?
8.64 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Uganda?
42 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do Singapore and Uganda rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per?
Singapore ranks 14th and Uganda ranks 15th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Singapore vs Uganda: General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/singapore/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/singapore/uganda/">Singapore vs Uganda: General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 6,865 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.