Qatar vs Senegal: General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per

Qatar
10.69 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2020
Senegal
11.76 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Qatar rank
44th
Senegal rank
42nd

General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per over time

  • Qatar
  • Senegal
2.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M12.5M196119922023

How they compare

Senegal currently reports 11.76 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 10.69 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Qatar, a difference of 1.07 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Senegal's figure about 1.1 times Qatar's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 40 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Senegal ahead.

Qatar ranks 44th and Senegal ranks 42nd of 172 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Qatar averaged higher in 2 and Senegal in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Qatar Senegal Difference Ahead
1980s 1.95 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.28 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.32 million constant LCU per square kilometre Senegal
1990s 2.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.53 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.44 million constant LCU per square kilometre Senegal
2000s 3.28 million constant LCU per square kilometre 5.55 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.27 million constant LCU per square kilometre Senegal
2010s 9.33 million constant LCU per square kilometre 7.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre Qatar
2020s 10.69 million constant LCU per square kilometre 9.63 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.07 million constant LCU per square kilometre Qatar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per, Qatar or Senegal?
Senegal, at 11.76 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 10.69 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Qatar as of 2023.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per between Qatar and Senegal?
1.07 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Senegal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Senegal?
40 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
How do Qatar and Senegal rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per?
Qatar ranks 44th and Senegal ranks 42nd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Qatar vs Senegal: General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/qatar/senegal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/qatar/senegal/">Qatar vs Senegal: General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 6,865 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.