Hong Kong vs Macao: General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per

Hong Kong
377.92 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Macao
1.55 billion constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong rank
6th
Macao rank
4th

General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Macao
0500.0M1.0B1.5B196119922023

How they compare

Macao currently reports 1.55 billion constant LCU per square kilometre against 377.92 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Hong Kong, a difference of 1.17 billion constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Macao's figure about 4.1 times Hong Kong's.

Across all 42 years both countries report, Macao has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong ranks 6th and Macao ranks 4th of 172 countries.

Macao has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Macao Difference Ahead
1980s 106.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre 309.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre 203.04 million constant LCU per square kilometre Macao
1990s 164.00 million constant LCU per square kilometre 755.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre 591.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre Macao
2000s 211.70 million constant LCU per square kilometre 803.75 million constant LCU per square kilometre 592.05 million constant LCU per square kilometre Macao
2010s 271.84 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.32 billion constant LCU per square kilometre 1.04 billion constant LCU per square kilometre Macao
2020s 369.87 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.62 billion constant LCU per square kilometre 1.25 billion constant LCU per square kilometre Macao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per, Hong Kong or Macao?
Macao, at 1.55 billion constant LCU per square kilometre against 377.92 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Hong Kong as of 2023.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per between Hong Kong and Macao?
1.17 billion constant LCU per square kilometre, with Macao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Macao?
42 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong and Macao rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per?
Hong Kong ranks 6th and Macao ranks 4th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Macao: General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/macao-sar-china/">Hong Kong vs Macao: General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 6,865 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.