Costa Rica vs Hungary: General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per

Costa Rica
132.12 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Hungary
123.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
10th
Hungary rank
11th

General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Hungary
25.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M125.0M196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 132.12 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 123.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Hungary, a difference of 8.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Hungary's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Hungary ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 10th and Hungary ranks 11th of 172 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Hungary in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Hungary Difference Ahead
1990s 68.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre 80.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre 12.55 million constant LCU per square kilometre Hungary
2000s 85.09 million constant LCU per square kilometre 90.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.97 million constant LCU per square kilometre Hungary
2010s 113.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre 100.74 million constant LCU per square kilometre 12.94 million constant LCU per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 131.27 million constant LCU per square kilometre 117.98 million constant LCU per square kilometre 13.29 million constant LCU per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per, Costa Rica or Hungary?
Costa Rica, at 132.12 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 123.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Hungary as of 2023.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per between Costa Rica and Hungary?
8.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Hungary?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Hungary rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per?
Costa Rica ranks 10th and Hungary ranks 11th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Hungary: General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/hungary/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/hungary/">Costa Rica vs Hungary: General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 6,865 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.