Central African Republic vs Latvia: General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per

Central African Republic
99,848 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
104,976 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
147th
Latvia rank
146th

General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Latvia
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k199520092023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 104,976 constant LCU per square kilometre against 99,848 constant LCU per square kilometre in Central African Republic, a difference of 5,128 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Central African Republic's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 147th and Latvia ranks 146th of 172 countries.

Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Latvia Difference Ahead
2000s 189,428 constant LCU per square kilometre 82,164 constant LCU per square kilometre 107,264 constant LCU per square kilometre Central African Republic
2010s 159,089 constant LCU per square kilometre 82,835 constant LCU per square kilometre 76,255 constant LCU per square kilometre Central African Republic
2020s 109,608 constant LCU per square kilometre 102,000 constant LCU per square kilometre 7,608 constant LCU per square kilometre Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per, Central African Republic or Latvia?
Latvia, at 104,976 constant LCU per square kilometre against 99,848 constant LCU per square kilometre in Central African Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per between Central African Republic and Latvia?
5,128 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Latvia?
15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Latvia rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per?
Central African Republic ranks 147th and Latvia ranks 146th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Latvia: General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/latvia/">Central African Republic vs Latvia: General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 6,865 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.