Cambodia vs Equatorial Guinea: General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per

Cambodia
50.98 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
42.84 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Cambodia rank
19th
Equatorial Guinea rank
22nd

General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per over time

  • Cambodia
  • Equatorial Guinea
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M50.0M199320082023

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 50.98 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 42.84 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 8.14 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Cambodia's figure about 1.2 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Cambodia ranks 19th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 22nd of 172 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 1 and Equatorial Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 13.53 million constant LCU per square kilometre 16.84 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.31 million constant LCU per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 29.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre 37.83 million constant LCU per square kilometre 7.96 million constant LCU per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 47.28 million constant LCU per square kilometre 40.36 million constant LCU per square kilometre 6.92 million constant LCU per square kilometre Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per, Cambodia or Equatorial Guinea?
Cambodia, at 50.98 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 42.84 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per between Cambodia and Equatorial Guinea?
8.14 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Equatorial Guinea?
19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do Cambodia and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per?
Cambodia ranks 19th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 22nd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs Equatorial Guinea: General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cambodia/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cambodia/equatorial-guinea/">Cambodia vs Equatorial Guinea: General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 6,865 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.