Hong Kong, China vs North Macedonia: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)

Hong Kong, China
0.0986 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
North Macedonia
0.0956 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Hong Kong, China rank
116th
North Macedonia rank
119th

General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • North Macedonia
00.250.50.7511.2196119932025

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 0.0986 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0956 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.003 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was North Macedonia ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 116th and North Macedonia ranks 119th of 168 countries.

North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1348 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3536 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2188 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP North Macedonia
2000s 0.1253 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2639 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1386 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP North Macedonia
2010s 0.0995 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1485 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.049 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP North Macedonia
2020s 0.1074 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1181 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0107 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), Hong Kong, China or North Macedonia?
Hong Kong, China, at 0.0986 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0956 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in North Macedonia as of 2025.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$) between Hong Kong, China and North Macedonia?
0.003 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and North Macedonia?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Hong Kong, China and North Macedonia rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$)?
Hong Kong, China ranks 116th and North Macedonia ranks 119th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs North Macedonia: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/hong-kong-sar-china/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/hong-kong-sar-china/north-macedonia/">Hong Kong, China vs North Macedonia: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 8,610 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.