Equatorial Guinea vs Sub-Saharan Africa: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)

Equatorial Guinea
0.2707 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Sub-Saharan Africa
0.1471 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
11th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
8th

General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
0.10.20.30.4199020072025

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.2707 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.1471 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 0.1236 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.8 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 11th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 8th of 168 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Sub-Saharan Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0898 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1715 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0817 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Sub-Saharan Africa
2010s 0.1733 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1461 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0272 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.2389 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1434 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0955 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), Equatorial Guinea or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.2707 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.1471 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2025.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$) between Equatorial Guinea and Sub-Saharan Africa?
0.1236 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sub-Saharan Africa?
21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$)?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 11th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 8th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Sub-Saharan Africa: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/equatorial-guinea/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/equatorial-guinea/sub-saharan-africa/">Equatorial Guinea vs Sub-Saharan Africa: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 8,610 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.