How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Rwanda?

35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Mozambique vs Rwanda: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)

Mozambique

163.77 constant 2015 US$ per person

in 2025

Rwanda

168.79 constant 2015 US$ per person

in 2025

Mozambique rank

140th

Rwanda rank

139th

General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) over time

Mozambique
Rwanda

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 168.79 constant 2015 US$ per person against 163.77 constant 2015 US$ per person in Mozambique, a difference of 5.02 constant 2015 US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Rwanda ahead.

Mozambique ranks 140th and Rwanda ranks 139th of 168 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 3 and Rwanda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Mozambique	Rwanda	Difference	Ahead
1990s	33.89 constant 2015 US$ per person	36.21 constant 2015 US$ per person	2.32 constant 2015 US$ per person	Rwanda
2000s	63.3 constant 2015 US$ per person	57.33 constant 2015 US$ per person	5.97 constant 2015 US$ per person	Mozambique
2010s	144.59 constant 2015 US$ per person	99.61 constant 2015 US$ per person	44.98 constant 2015 US$ per person	Mozambique
2020s	157.33 constant 2015 US$ per person	157.27 constant 2015 US$ per person	0.058 constant 2015 US$ per person	Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), Mozambique or Rwanda?: Rwanda, at 168.79 constant 2015 US$ per person against 163.77 constant 2015 US$ per person in Mozambique as of 2025.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$) between Mozambique and Rwanda?: 5.02 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Rwanda?: 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Mozambique and Rwanda rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$)?: Mozambique ranks 140th and Rwanda ranks 139th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs Rwanda: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-capita/mozambique/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-capita/mozambique/rwanda/">Mozambique vs Rwanda: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit: constant 2015 US$ per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 201 places, 8,621 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 10 September 2026

General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.