High income vs Luxembourg: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)

High income
7,438 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2024
Luxembourg
20,590 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
High income rank
5th
Luxembourg rank
2nd

General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • High income
  • Luxembourg
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k197019972025

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 20,590 constant 2015 US$ per person against 7,438 constant 2015 US$ per person in High income, a difference of 13,152 constant 2015 US$ per person.

That makes Luxembourg's figure about 2.8 times High income's.

Across all 55 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.

High income ranks 5th and Luxembourg ranks 2nd of 33 groups.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade High income Luxembourg Difference Ahead
1970s 3,781 constant 2015 US$ per person 6,811 constant 2015 US$ per person 3,030 constant 2015 US$ per person Luxembourg
1980s 4,534 constant 2015 US$ per person 8,714 constant 2015 US$ per person 4,180 constant 2015 US$ per person Luxembourg
1990s 5,163 constant 2015 US$ per person 12,448 constant 2015 US$ per person 7,284 constant 2015 US$ per person Luxembourg
2000s 5,951 constant 2015 US$ per person 15,511 constant 2015 US$ per person 9,561 constant 2015 US$ per person Luxembourg
2010s 6,473 constant 2015 US$ per person 16,953 constant 2015 US$ per person 10,480 constant 2015 US$ per person Luxembourg
2020s 7,190 constant 2015 US$ per person 19,409 constant 2015 US$ per person 12,219 constant 2015 US$ per person Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), High income or Luxembourg?
Luxembourg, at 20,590 constant 2015 US$ per person against 7,438 constant 2015 US$ per person in High income as of 2025.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$) between High income and Luxembourg?
13,152 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for High income and Luxembourg?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do High income and Luxembourg rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$)?
High income ranks 5th and Luxembourg ranks 2nd of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

High income vs Luxembourg: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-capita/high-income/luxembourg/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-capita/high-income/luxembourg/">High income vs Luxembourg: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 8,621 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.