How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Uganda?

44 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo vs Uganda: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)

Congo

143.01 constant 2015 US$ per person

in 2025

Uganda

146.97 constant 2015 US$ per person

in 2025

Congo rank

147th

Uganda rank

144th

General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) over time

Congo
Uganda

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 146.97 constant 2015 US$ per person against 143.01 constant 2015 US$ per person in Congo, a difference of 3.96 constant 2015 US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 147th and Uganda ranks 144th of 168 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo	Uganda	Difference	Ahead
1980s	274.7 constant 2015 US$ per person	42.4 constant 2015 US$ per person	232.3 constant 2015 US$ per person	Congo
1990s	220.84 constant 2015 US$ per person	49.04 constant 2015 US$ per person	171.8 constant 2015 US$ per person	Congo
2000s	306.96 constant 2015 US$ per person	59.54 constant 2015 US$ per person	247.41 constant 2015 US$ per person	Congo
2010s	412.5 constant 2015 US$ per person	76.77 constant 2015 US$ per person	335.73 constant 2015 US$ per person	Congo
2020s	145.93 constant 2015 US$ per person	112.16 constant 2015 US$ per person	33.77 constant 2015 US$ per person	Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), Congo or Uganda?: Uganda, at 146.97 constant 2015 US$ per person against 143.01 constant 2015 US$ per person in Congo as of 2025.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$) between Congo and Uganda?: 3.96 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Uganda?: 44 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2025.
How do Congo and Uganda rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$)?: Congo ranks 147th and Uganda ranks 144th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Uganda: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-capita/congo-rep/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-capita/congo-rep/uganda/">Congo vs Uganda: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit: constant 2015 US$ per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 201 places, 8,621 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 10 September 2026

General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.