Equatorial Guinea vs Tanzania, United Republic of: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)

Equatorial Guinea
13.39 % change on previous year
in 2025
Tanzania, United Republic of
15.19 % change on previous year
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
13th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
11th

General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
-40-20020199120082025

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 15.19 % change on previous year against 13.39 % change on previous year in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 1.8 % change on previous year.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 13th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 11th of 168 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
2000s 20.4 % change on previous year 6.27 % change on previous year 14.13 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea
2010s 6.25 % change on previous year 3.69 % change on previous year 2.57 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea
2020s 3.81 % change on previous year 10.02 % change on previous year 6.21 % change on previous year Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), Equatorial Guinea or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 15.19 % change on previous year against 13.39 % change on previous year in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
What is the difference in general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$) between Equatorial Guinea and Tanzania, United Republic of?
1.8 % change on previous year, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Tanzania, United Republic of?
20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for general government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$)?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 13th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 11th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Tanzania, United Republic of: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-annual-growth-rate/equatorial-guinea/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-annual-growth-rate/equatorial-guinea/tanzania/">Equatorial Guinea vs Tanzania, United Republic of: General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 8,420 data points, 1961–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.