Mauritius vs South Africa: Gender gap in the share of workers not classified by status in
Gender gap in the share of workers not classified by status in over time
- Mauritius
- South Africa
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports -0.01 % against -0.02 % in South Africa, a difference of 0.01 %.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2001 it was South Africa ahead.
Mauritius ranks 12th and South Africa ranks 13th of 30 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.105 % | 0.045 % | 0.06 % | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 0.11 % | -0.025 % | 0.135 % | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gender gap in the share of workers not classified by status in, Mauritius or South Africa?
- Mauritius, at -0.01 % against -0.02 % in South Africa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gender gap in the share of workers not classified by status in between Mauritius and South Africa?
- 0.01 %, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and South Africa?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2011.
- How do Mauritius and South Africa rank globally for gender gap in the share of workers not classified by status in?
- Mauritius ranks 12th and South Africa ranks 13th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gender gap in the share of workers not classified by status in [industry]: Total employment — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.