Georgia vs Kyrgyzstan: Gender gap in the share of workers not classified by status in
Gender gap in the share of workers not classified by status in over time
- Georgia
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Georgia currently reports -9.22 % against -14.62 % in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 5.4 %.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 28th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 29th of 30 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gender gap in the share of workers not classified by status in, Georgia or Kyrgyzstan?
- Georgia, at -9.22 % against -14.62 % in Kyrgyzstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gender gap in the share of workers not classified by status in between Georgia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5.4 %, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2016.
- How do Georgia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for gender gap in the share of workers not classified by status in?
- Georgia ranks 28th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 29th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gender gap in the share of workers not classified by status in [industry]: Total employment — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.