Brazil vs Ecuador: Gender gap in the share of workers not classified by status in
Gender gap in the share of workers not classified by status in over time
- Brazil
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports -0.13 % against -0.18 % in Brazil, a difference of 0.05 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 20th and Ecuador ranks 19th of 30 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Ecuador in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.3533 % | -0.4333 % | 0.08 % | Brazil |
| 2010s | -0.25 % | -0.21 % | 0.04 % | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gender gap in the share of workers not classified by status in, Brazil or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at -0.13 % against -0.18 % in Brazil as of 2020.
- What is the difference in gender gap in the share of workers not classified by status in between Brazil and Ecuador?
- 0.05 %, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Ecuador?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2012.
- How do Brazil and Ecuador rank globally for gender gap in the share of workers not classified by status in?
- Brazil ranks 20th and Ecuador ranks 19th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gender gap in the share of workers not classified by status in [industry]: Total employment — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.