Botswana vs Greece: Gender gap in the share of Self-employed people in [industry]: Total
Gender gap in the share of Self-employed people in [industry]: Total over time
- Botswana
- Greece
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 12.88 % against 11.12 % in Greece, a difference of 1.76 %.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.2 times Greece's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Greece ahead.
Botswana ranks 8th and Greece ranks 11th of 68 countries.
Greece has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Greece | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -4.55 % | 8.12 % | 12.67 % | Greece |
| 2010s | 4.55 % | 8.93 % | 4.38 % | Greece |
| 2020s | 10.08 % | 10.3 % | 0.22 % | Greece |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gender gap in the share of self-employed people in [industry]: total, Botswana or Greece?
- Botswana, at 12.88 % against 11.12 % in Greece as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gender gap in the share of self-employed people in [industry]: total between Botswana and Greece?
- 1.76 %, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Greece?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Botswana and Greece rank globally for gender gap in the share of self-employed people in [industry]: total?
- Botswana ranks 8th and Greece ranks 11th of 68 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gender gap in the share of Self-employed people in [industry]: Total employment — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.