Indonesia vs Japan: Gender gap in the share of people who used the internet in the
Gender gap in the share of people who used the internet in the over time
- Indonesia
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 5.76 % against 5.75 % in Indonesia, a difference of 0.01 %.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Japan ahead.
Indonesia ranks 4th and Japan ranks 3rd of 81 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 1 and Japan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.88 % | 4.62 % | 0.74 % | Japan |
| 2020s | 5.88 % | 5.78 % | 0.0967 % | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gender gap in the share of people who used the internet in the, Indonesia or Japan?
- Japan, at 5.76 % against 5.75 % in Indonesia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in gender gap in the share of people who used the internet in the between Indonesia and Japan?
- 0.01 %, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Japan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Indonesia and Japan rank globally for gender gap in the share of people who used the internet in the?
- Indonesia ranks 4th and Japan ranks 3rd of 81 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gender gap in the share of people who used the internet in the previous three months — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.