Albania vs Belarus: Gender gap in the share of Employees in [industry]: Total employment
Gender gap in the share of Employees in [industry]: Total employment over time
- Albania
- Belarus
How they compare
Belarus currently reports -2.05 % against -2.18 % in Albania, a difference of 0.13 %.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Albania ahead.
Albania ranks 32nd and Belarus ranks 31st of 68 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Albania averaged higher in 1 and Belarus in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Belarus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -3.97 % | -3.15 % | 0.815 % | Belarus |
| 2020s | -2.47 % | -2.6 % | 0.124 % | Albania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gender gap in the share of employees in [industry]: total employment, Albania or Belarus?
- Belarus, at -2.05 % against -2.18 % in Albania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gender gap in the share of employees in [industry]: total employment between Albania and Belarus?
- 0.13 %, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Belarus?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do Albania and Belarus rank globally for gender gap in the share of employees in [industry]: total employment?
- Albania ranks 32nd and Belarus ranks 31st of 68 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gender gap in the share of Employees in [industry]: Total employment — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.