Mexico vs Rwanda: Gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, urban — Value
Gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, urban — Value over time
- Mexico
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports -3.84 % against -4 % in Mexico, a difference of 0.16 %.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Mexico ranks 42nd and Rwanda ranks 41st of 73 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -5.05 % | 0.645 % | 5.7 % | Rwanda |
| 2010s | -4.56 % | 1.77 % | 6.33 % | Rwanda |
| 2020s | -4.25 % | -1.64 % | 2.62 % | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, urban — value, Mexico or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at -3.84 % against -4 % in Mexico as of 2022.
- What is the difference in gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, urban — value between Mexico and Rwanda?
- 0.16 %, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Rwanda?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Mexico and Rwanda rank globally for gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, urban — value?
- Mexico ranks 42nd and Rwanda ranks 41st of 73 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, urban — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.