Finland vs Senegal: Gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, urban — Value
Gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, urban — Value over time
- Finland
- Senegal
How they compare
Finland currently reports 0.9 % against 0.75 % in Senegal, a difference of 0.15 %.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.2 times Senegal's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Senegal ahead.
Finland ranks 16th and Senegal ranks 17th of 73 countries.
Senegal has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, urban — value, Finland or Senegal?
- Finland, at 0.9 % against 0.75 % in Senegal as of 2021.
- What is the difference in gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, urban — value between Finland and Senegal?
- 0.15 %, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Senegal?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Finland and Senegal rank globally for gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, urban — value?
- Finland ranks 16th and Senegal ranks 17th of 73 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, urban — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.