Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, urban — Value

Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
-6.59 %
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
4.94 %
in 2022
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) rank
2nd
United Republic of Tanzania rank
1st

Gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, urban — Value over time

  • Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
  • United Republic of Tanzania
-5051015200020112023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 4.94 % against -6.59 % in Bolivia (Plurinational State of), a difference of 11.53 %.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2002 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 2nd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 1st of 3 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Bolivia (Plurinational State of) averaged higher in 1 and United Republic of Tanzania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia (Plurinational State of) United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 2.45 % 1.51 % 0.945 % Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
2010s -1.4 % 9.13 % 10.53 % United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, urban — value, Bolivia (Plurinational State of) or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 4.94 % against -6.59 % in Bolivia (Plurinational State of) as of 2022.
What is the difference in gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, urban — value between Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and United Republic of Tanzania?
11.53 %, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and United Republic of Tanzania?
5 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2018.
How do Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, urban — value?
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 2nd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 1st of 3 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, urban — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, urban — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gender-gap-in-the-completion-rate-upper-secondary-urban-value-all-age-ranges-or-no/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gender-gap-in-the-completion-rate-upper-secondary-urban-value-all-age-ranges-or-no/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, urban — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, urban — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Urban
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
76 places, 933 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.