South Africa vs Uruguay: Gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, rural — Value
Gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, rural — Value over time
- South Africa
- Uruguay
How they compare
South Africa currently reports -19.41 % against -22.5 % in Uruguay, a difference of 3.09 %.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2011 it was South Africa ahead.
South Africa ranks 69th and Uruguay ranks 71st of 73 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -6.61 % | -13.35 % | 6.74 % | South Africa |
| 2020s | -10.04 % | -11.4 % | 1.36 % | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, rural — value, South Africa or Uruguay?
- South Africa, at -19.41 % against -22.5 % in Uruguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, rural — value between South Africa and Uruguay?
- 3.09 %, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Uruguay?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
- How do South Africa and Uruguay rank globally for gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, rural — value?
- South Africa ranks 69th and Uruguay ranks 71st of 73 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, rural — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.