Honduras vs Lesotho: Gender gap in the completion rate, primary education, urban — Value
Gender gap in the completion rate, primary education, urban — Value over time
- Honduras
- Lesotho
How they compare
Honduras currently reports -3.67 % against -4.93 % in Lesotho, a difference of 1.26 %.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Honduras has been ahead every year.
Honduras ranks 59th and Lesotho ranks 61st of 68 countries.
Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -4.95 % | -9.05 % | 4.1 % | Honduras |
| 2010s | -2.35 % | -9.12 % | 6.77 % | Honduras |
| 2020s | -3.67 % | -4.93 % | 1.26 % | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gender gap in the completion rate, primary education, urban — value, Honduras or Lesotho?
- Honduras, at -3.67 % against -4.93 % in Lesotho as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gender gap in the completion rate, primary education, urban — value between Honduras and Lesotho?
- 1.26 %, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Lesotho?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Honduras and Lesotho rank globally for gender gap in the completion rate, primary education, urban — value?
- Honduras ranks 59th and Lesotho ranks 61st of 68 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gender gap in the completion rate, primary education, urban — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.