Costa Rica vs Panama: Gender gap in the completion rate, primary education, rural — Value
Gender gap in the completion rate, primary education, rural — Value over time
- Costa Rica
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 2.5 % against 1 % in Costa Rica, a difference of 1.5 %.
That makes Panama's figure about 2.5 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 9th and Panama ranks 6th of 68 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -5.2 % | -1.93 % | 3.27 % | Panama |
| 2010s | -3.03 % | -1.32 % | 1.71 % | Panama |
| 2020s | -0.6333 % | 0.4 % | 1.03 % | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gender gap in the completion rate, primary education, rural — value, Costa Rica or Panama?
- Panama, at 2.5 % against 1 % in Costa Rica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gender gap in the completion rate, primary education, rural — value between Costa Rica and Panama?
- 1.5 %, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Panama?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Panama rank globally for gender gap in the completion rate, primary education, rural — value?
- Costa Rica ranks 9th and Panama ranks 6th of 68 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gender gap in the completion rate, primary education, rural — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.