Costa Rica vs Kenya: Gender gap in the completion rate, lower secondary, urban — Value
Gender gap in the completion rate, lower secondary, urban — Value over time
- Costa Rica
- Kenya
How they compare
Kenya currently reports -3.89 % against -4.4 % in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.51 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 64th and Kenya ranks 61st of 73 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Kenya in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -2.33 % | -4.52 % | 2.18 % | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | -5.9 % | -4.75 % | 1.16 % | Kenya |
| 2020s | -5.7 % | -4.12 % | 1.58 % | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gender gap in the completion rate, lower secondary, urban — value, Costa Rica or Kenya?
- Kenya, at -3.89 % against -4.4 % in Costa Rica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gender gap in the completion rate, lower secondary, urban — value between Costa Rica and Kenya?
- 0.51 %, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Kenya?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Costa Rica and Kenya rank globally for gender gap in the completion rate, lower secondary, urban — value?
- Costa Rica ranks 64th and Kenya ranks 61st of 73 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gender gap in the completion rate, lower secondary, urban — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.