Estonia vs Ghana: Gender gap in the completion rate, lower secondary, rural — Value
Gender gap in the completion rate, lower secondary, rural — Value over time
- Estonia
- Ghana
How they compare
Ghana currently reports -1.4 % against -1.44 % in Estonia, a difference of 0.04 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Ghana ahead.
Estonia ranks 39th and Ghana ranks 38th of 72 countries.
Ghana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -2.28 % | 3.53 % | 5.81 % | Ghana |
| 2010s | -2.8 % | -1.6 % | 1.2 % | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gender gap in the completion rate, lower secondary, rural — value, Estonia or Ghana?
- Ghana, at -1.4 % against -1.44 % in Estonia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in gender gap in the completion rate, lower secondary, rural — value between Estonia and Ghana?
- 0.04 %, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Ghana?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2017.
- How do Estonia and Ghana rank globally for gender gap in the completion rate, lower secondary, rural — value?
- Estonia ranks 39th and Ghana ranks 38th of 72 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gender gap in the completion rate, lower secondary, rural — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.