Egypt vs Lithuania: Gender gap in the completion rate, lower secondary, rural — Value
Gender gap in the completion rate, lower secondary, rural — Value over time
- Egypt
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports -0.48 % against -0.66 % in Egypt, a difference of 0.18 %.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Egypt ahead.
Egypt ranks 36th and Lithuania ranks 35th of 72 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.33 % | -0.33 % | 6.66 % | Egypt |
| 2010s | -1.86 % | -0.98 % | 0.8833 % | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 1.41 % | -0.48 % | 1.89 % | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gender gap in the completion rate, lower secondary, rural — value, Egypt or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at -0.48 % against -0.66 % in Egypt as of 2021.
- What is the difference in gender gap in the completion rate, lower secondary, rural — value between Egypt and Lithuania?
- 0.18 %, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Lithuania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2021.
- How do Egypt and Lithuania rank globally for gender gap in the completion rate, lower secondary, rural — value?
- Egypt ranks 36th and Lithuania ranks 35th of 72 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gender gap in the completion rate, lower secondary, rural — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.