Brazil vs Dominican Republic: Gender gap in the completion rate, lower secondary, rural — Value
Gender gap in the completion rate, lower secondary, rural — Value over time
- Brazil
- Dominican Republic
How they compare
Brazil currently reports -10.2 % against -10.3 % in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.1 %.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 66th and Dominican Republic ranks 67th of 72 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Dominican Republic in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Dominican Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -13.46 % | -16.09 % | 2.63 % | Brazil |
| 2010s | -12.77 % | -14.66 % | 1.9 % | Brazil |
| 2020s | -11.35 % | -9.32 % | 2.03 % | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gender gap in the completion rate, lower secondary, rural — value, Brazil or Dominican Republic?
- Brazil, at -10.2 % against -10.3 % in Dominican Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gender gap in the completion rate, lower secondary, rural — value between Brazil and Dominican Republic?
- 0.1 %, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Dominican Republic?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
- How do Brazil and Dominican Republic rank globally for gender gap in the completion rate, lower secondary, rural — value?
- Brazil ranks 66th and Dominican Republic ranks 67th of 72 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gender gap in the completion rate, lower secondary, rural — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.