Costa Rica vs Ghana: Gender gap in share of people (15+) who report having an account at a
Gender gap in share of people (15+) who report having an account at a over time
- Costa Rica
- Ghana
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 6.24 % against 6.11 % in Ghana, a difference of 0.13 %.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 36th and Ghana ranks 37th of 97 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 14.37 % | 5.04 % | 9.33 % | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 10.75 % | 8.86 % | 1.89 % | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gender gap in share of people (15+) who report having an account at a, Costa Rica or Ghana?
- Costa Rica, at 6.24 % against 6.11 % in Ghana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gender gap in share of people (15+) who report having an account at a between Costa Rica and Ghana?
- 0.13 %, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Ghana?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Ghana rank globally for gender gap in share of people (15+) who report having an account at a?
- Costa Rica ranks 36th and Ghana ranks 37th of 97 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gender gap in share of people (15+) who report having an account at a bank (by themselves or with someone else) — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.