Costa Rica vs Jordan: Gender gap in earnings of employees in urban areas — Value — All age
Gender gap in earnings of employees in urban areas — Value — All age over time
- Costa Rica
- Jordan
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports -0.03 % against -0.04 % in Jordan, a difference of 0.01 %.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Jordan ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 26th and Jordan ranks 28th of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Jordan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -0.0467 % | -0.04 % | 0.0067 % | Jordan |
| 2020s | -0.0475 % | -0.1825 % | 0.135 % | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gender gap in earnings of employees in urban areas — value — all age, Costa Rica or Jordan?
- Costa Rica, at -0.03 % against -0.04 % in Jordan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gender gap in earnings of employees in urban areas — value — all age between Costa Rica and Jordan?
- 0.01 %, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Jordan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Jordan rank globally for gender gap in earnings of employees in urban areas — value — all age?
- Costa Rica ranks 26th and Jordan ranks 28th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gender gap in earnings of employees in urban areas — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.