Costa Rica vs El Salvador: Gender gap in earnings of employees in urban areas — Value — All age
Gender gap in earnings of employees in urban areas — Value — All age over time
- Costa Rica
- El Salvador
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports -0.01 % against -0.03 % in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.02 %.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 26th and El Salvador ranks 25th of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and El Salvador in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0056 % | -0.0189 % | 0.0244 % | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | -0.0667 % | -0.0467 % | 0.02 % | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gender gap in earnings of employees in urban areas — value — all age, Costa Rica or El Salvador?
- El Salvador, at -0.01 % against -0.03 % in Costa Rica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gender gap in earnings of employees in urban areas — value — all age between Costa Rica and El Salvador?
- 0.02 %, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and El Salvador?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and El Salvador rank globally for gender gap in earnings of employees in urban areas — value — all age?
- Costa Rica ranks 26th and El Salvador ranks 25th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gender gap in earnings of employees in urban areas — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.