Azerbaijan vs Thailand: Gender gap in adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, rural
Gender gap in adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, rural over time
- Azerbaijan
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 0.59 % against 0.18 % in Azerbaijan, a difference of 0.41 %.
That makes Thailand's figure about 3.3 times Azerbaijan's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.
Azerbaijan ranks 32nd and Thailand ranks 30th of 41 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gender gap in adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, rural, Azerbaijan or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 0.59 % against 0.18 % in Azerbaijan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in gender gap in adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, rural between Azerbaijan and Thailand?
- 0.41 %, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Thailand?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2019.
- How do Azerbaijan and Thailand rank globally for gender gap in adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, rural?
- Azerbaijan ranks 32nd and Thailand ranks 30th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gender gap in adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, rural — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.