Seychelles vs Trinidad and Tobago: Gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre

Seychelles
4.24 million units per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
4.24 million units per square kilometre
in 2023
Seychelles rank
40th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
39th

Gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre over time

  • Seychelles
  • Trinidad and Tobago
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M5.0M196119922023

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 4.24 million units per square kilometre against 4.24 million units per square kilometre in Seychelles, a difference of 3,820 units per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.

Seychelles ranks 40th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 39th of 208 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Seychelles Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 356,304 units per square kilometre 948,182 units per square kilometre 591,878 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 672,247 units per square kilometre 1.35 million units per square kilometre 674,380 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 993,495 units per square kilometre 1.72 million units per square kilometre 723,273 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 1.63 million units per square kilometre 1.85 million units per square kilometre 220,390 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 2.13 million units per square kilometre 3.68 million units per square kilometre 1.56 million units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 3.17 million units per square kilometre 4.82 million units per square kilometre 1.65 million units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 3.90 million units per square kilometre 4.19 million units per square kilometre 290,392 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre, Seychelles or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 4.24 million units per square kilometre against 4.24 million units per square kilometre in Seychelles as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre between Seychelles and Trinidad and Tobago?
3,820 units per square kilometre, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Seychelles and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Seychelles and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre?
Seychelles ranks 40th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 39th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Seychelles vs Trinidad and Tobago: Gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-worldbank-constant-usd-per-square-kilometre/seychelles/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-worldbank-constant-usd-per-square-kilometre/seychelles/trinidad-and-tobago/">Seychelles vs Trinidad and Tobago: Gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 10,650 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gdp worldbank constant usd divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.