Lesotho vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre

Lesotho
74,089 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
79,661 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Lesotho rank
175th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
174th

Gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre over time

  • Lesotho
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 79,661 units per square kilometre against 74,089 units per square kilometre in Lesotho, a difference of 5,572 units per square kilometre.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Lesotho's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Lesotho ranks 175th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 174th of 208 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 5 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 8,883 units per square kilometre 12,163 units per square kilometre 3,280 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
1970s 15,102 units per square kilometre 9,795 units per square kilometre 5,307 units per square kilometre Lesotho
1980s 24,740 units per square kilometre 12,215 units per square kilometre 12,525 units per square kilometre Lesotho
1990s 40,181 units per square kilometre 17,187 units per square kilometre 22,994 units per square kilometre Lesotho
2000s 54,966 units per square kilometre 28,487 units per square kilometre 26,479 units per square kilometre Lesotho
2010s 74,502 units per square kilometre 52,789 units per square kilometre 21,713 units per square kilometre Lesotho
2020s 71,919 units per square kilometre 74,372 units per square kilometre 2,453 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre, Lesotho or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 79,661 units per square kilometre against 74,089 units per square kilometre in Lesotho as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre between Lesotho and Tanzania, United Republic of?
5,572 units per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Tanzania, United Republic of?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Lesotho and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre?
Lesotho ranks 175th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 174th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lesotho vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-worldbank-constant-usd-per-square-kilometre/lesotho/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-worldbank-constant-usd-per-square-kilometre/lesotho/tanzania/">Lesotho vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 10,650 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gdp worldbank constant usd divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.