Iran, Islamic Republic of vs Tunisia: Gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre

Iran, Islamic Republic of
317,638 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
311,555 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
126th
Tunisia rank
127th

Gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre over time

  • Iran, Islamic Republic of
  • Tunisia
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

Iran, Islamic Republic of currently reports 317,638 units per square kilometre against 311,555 units per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 6,083 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tunisia ahead.

Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 126th and Tunisia ranks 127th of 208 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iran, Islamic Republic of averaged higher in 3 and Tunisia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iran, Islamic Republic of Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 52,678 units per square kilometre 34,683 units per square kilometre 17,996 units per square kilometre Iran, Islamic Republic of
1970s 127,515 units per square kilometre 57,078 units per square kilometre 70,437 units per square kilometre Iran, Islamic Republic of
1980s 103,390 units per square kilometre 93,420 units per square kilometre 9,970 units per square kilometre Iran, Islamic Republic of
1990s 135,830 units per square kilometre 139,395 units per square kilometre 3,564 units per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 200,785 units per square kilometre 217,539 units per square kilometre 16,754 units per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 259,494 units per square kilometre 291,462 units per square kilometre 31,968 units per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 296,423 units per square kilometre 303,540 units per square kilometre 7,117 units per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre, Iran, Islamic Republic of or Tunisia?
Iran, Islamic Republic of, at 317,638 units per square kilometre against 311,555 units per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre between Iran, Islamic Republic of and Tunisia?
6,083 units per square kilometre, with Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iran, Islamic Republic of and Tunisia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iran, Islamic Republic of and Tunisia rank globally for gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre?
Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 126th and Tunisia ranks 127th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iran, Islamic Republic of vs Tunisia: Gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-worldbank-constant-usd-per-square-kilometre/iran-islamic-rep/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-worldbank-constant-usd-per-square-kilometre/iran-islamic-rep/tunisia/">Iran, Islamic Republic of vs Tunisia: Gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 10,650 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gdp worldbank constant usd divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.